This site is so awesome. Pearlshipping is my OTP
In Depth Study
The Co-existence Theory
You may or may not have heard of Pearlshipping's flagship song, High Touch. High Touch clearly shows Ash
and Dawn's closeness to each other. This has not featured in any case before. (Misty's song is not a valid argument because it was inserted by the dub 4Kids, which means the song is not canon). Their depiction is this song is borderline romantic, to say the least. It would be certain to say that if another couple existed, this other
girl would be jealous. Also, if another couple existed, along with High Touch, it would give a polygamous & perhaps adulterous impression.
The song High Touch, is simply too implicit for Pearlshipping to allow another ship to co-exist with the song still in existence to come into play.
Check out our lyric analysis of High Touch on the music page:
Doppelgängers
Dawn and Princess Salvia- What does this mean for Pearlshipping?
19/10/2015 13:59Parallel Pair
Ash and Dawn, Iris and Cilan
01/11/2014 17:14The Kenny-Serena Theory
There have been many concerns over a new ship in Pokemon known as Amourshipping. Now, Serena has a very obvious crush on Ash, more or less as obvious as Kenny's crush on Dawn. Bad news for Pearlshipping? I think not. It is known that, as said before, Kenny's goodbye in the DP series is very much Dawn letting him down gently for Ash. Ash and Dawn are known to have many parallels-(the way they bonded with their starter Pokemon, their brief period of insecurity)- Kenny and Serena are potentially one of them.
It has also been stated in general anime tradition that childhood friends who have a crush on a main protagonist rarely get their way. Kenny is definitely Dawn's childhood friend. It is disputable as to whether Serena could be described as Ash's childhood friend, their meeting in the anime portrayed very much as a one-time incident, but for the sake of this theory, we will assume that they could be called childhood friends (who is to say that they don't further interact at the summer school?(which would make them childhood friends)). Childhood friends are very much there to make characters notice each other in a romantic light. Judging by the fact that it is likely Ash and Dawn will meet again (See: Farewell, or See You Later?), it is not implausible that this is Serena's role, rather than for her and Ash to become a couple, same with Kenny and Dawn.
Topic: In Depth Study
thanks
shiny.pikachu | 09/03/2016
I just wanted to say i successfully converted my brother back to pearlshipping using this page. Usually, this page or Music is enough for me to win debates, i am glad that i have these valuable resources, i probably would not be a pearlshipper right now if I didn't
The Kenny-Serena Theory
Kirby kart | 26/08/2015
That helped me Lot. I was confused for a moment and was gonna switch to AmourShipping, but after reading that, I know that I'll be sticking to PearlShipping for a long time.
Totally agree
Sam | 11/08/2014
Was worried for a bit when armourshipping started but if you look at all the moments ash & dawn had together it just sinks armourshippings ship! Pearlshipping will come through!!
pearlshipping
FISH AI | 22/07/2014
You know how everyone mentions all the amourshipping posters? Theres one where Serena looks at Ash blushing and the one where Serena is holding a heart looking at Ash but in both of those Ash is just minding his own business and not paying attention to Serena. This could be a way the writers are saying that amourshipping will always be one sided.
Re: pearlshipping
Torterror | 24/08/2015
In one of the DP episodes Ash wanted to do some training, but Dawn wanted to go shopping. Ash and Brock agrees to come with Dawn. The key part is that Ash did not ditch Dawn to go train with his pokemon, but he does ditch Serena to go have a battle with that trainer and his Treeko.
Re: Re: pearlshipping
PokeDerps9000 | 28/08/2015
Watch the episode again and you will notice that Dawn is holding Ash by the hand and Brock by his forearm.
Re: Nice!
NovaStorm (TM 87) | 08/04/2014
That exact link messed me up for the longest time. There is an analysis for the song, it is in the music section. :)